Globe 2010: World-renowned sustainability experts

GLOBE 2010 is one of the world’s largest and longest-running events dedicated to the business of the environment. Every two years, over 10,000 professionals from 70+ countries come together at GLOBE for three days of thought-leading sessions presented by world-renowned sustainability experts; to survey leading-edge environmental innovations; and to participate in unparalleled global networking opportunities.

The Harvest Power Team will be in attendance of this event as well on Thursday and Friday, Look us up if you are around!

Well recognized as the world’s most influential and prestigious international environment industry event, GLOBE brings people together to discuss current trends and to showcase innovative technology solutions for the world’s environmental problems. Every two years, over 10,000 participants from over 80 countries gather in Vancouver, generating over $400 million in new environmental business.

Government decisions makers, corporate executives, and environmental technology innovators engage in high-level dialogues about pressing environmental issues such as corporate sustainability, energy and climate change, finance, and building better cities. We have brought in a host of well-respected individuals to help make the business case for eco-efficiency, including HRH Prince Philippe of Belgium, former Prime Minister Paul Martin, Maurice Strong, Klaus Töepfer, John Prescott, Mark Moody-Stuart, Amory Lovins and Ray Anderson.

GLOBE

Series events have been used to preview innovative ideas and major multilateral processes for corporate and industry leaders from around the world in advance of major international gatherings such as the Rio and Johannesburg World Summits.

Cooperation, Not Solid Waste Showdowns

We need materials management solutions, not solid waste showdowns.  In the March-April 2010 edition of MSW Management, Rick Brandes, former chief of the Energy Recovery and Waste Disposal Branch, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, of the EPA, implores:

Please! There is so much trash generated (between 240 and 400 million tons per year, depending on how you count it), in so many places (where isn’t it generated?), that we need all the materials management solutions we can get. Landfills are many things, convenient, inexpensive, practical, but they should not be seen as permanent solutions. Who knows what environmental legacy they represent? We don’t know what will happen with them in the years ahead.

Mr. Brandes then touches on  cradle-to-grave models of product supply chains, asks for increased cooperation between stakeholders, and recognizes that different communities have different needs.  Showcasing alternative strategies, Mr. Brandes writes:

It’s not like there are no alternative strategies. There are many, many ways to beneficially use this trash mountain of ours. Augment soil. Generate power. Make paper and save trees. Reduce bauxite mining. Recover even more metal out of the ash. Make park benches and roads. Produce ethanol and biodiesel. Use all alternatives where they make sense. Use different waste management strategies in different places. Do more of some of these things in some places and less of them in other places. But don’t editorially gun people down when they don’t do what you think they should do. Give communities the best available information, and they will probably do what is best for them. Let them make their trash more valuable.

At Harvest, we like to think we offer the collaboration and innovative solution options that Mr. Brandes would like to see in regards to organics waste management.  Read the full text of “Cooperation, Not Conflict: Municipal Solid Waste Management in the 21st Century” here.

Food Waste Can Fuel Its Own Collection, Plus Produce Clean Energy

By Tom Kraemer

As VP for project delivery at Harvest, I’m responsible for getting our biogas-energy plants up and running.  We’re currently in the permitting and engineering stage for our first biogas-energy plant in Richmond BC, near Vancouver.  We’ll use food waste collected from households and businesses in the Metro Vancouver region as our fuel to make the biogas.

So I couldn’t help wondering: Is this food waste-to-energy technology sustainable?  There was a lot of publicity last year about ethanol requiring more energy to produce than you can get from the fuel.  Is biogas from food waste a better deal for the environment?  The answer is yes.  It turns out that a tonne of food waste produces enough biogas to not only fuel the collection vehicle that picks it up, but also provide enough energy to power the biogas production process.  In other words, the food waste will collect itself and turn itself into clean energy!  All we have to do is supply the right equipment and feedstock. Sounds sustainable to me!

Here are the numbers:

• Your average garbage truck is a real fuel hog.  It gets only about 2.8 miles or 4.5 km per gallon of diesel fuel, which is the fuel that most garbage trucks use.
• On an energy content basis, one gallon of diesel fuel is equivalent to about 4 cubic meters of natural gas.
• Our biogas digester will produce about 65 cubic meters of natural gas equivalent from each tonne of food waste.  The actual biogas production is about 100 cubic meters per tonne of waste, but it’s lower in energy content than natural gas so I’ve converted it to natural gas equivalent based on its energy content.  This biogas production estimate is based on data we’ve collected from European plants that have been using this technology for several years.  Our plant will be the first in North America.
• Doing the math, 65 divided by 4 times 4.5 equals 73 km per tonne of food waste, which means we can make the garbage truck go 73 km for each tonne of food waste we put into that same garbage truck.
• Since our typical planned round-trip distance for collecting food waste is only about 30 km, we have energy to spare.

You may now say, ha! You haven’t considered all of the energy needed to process the gas that comes out of that food waste and pressurize it for those high-pressure CNG tanks on that garbage truck.  Well, the ever-vigilant California Air Resources Board (CARB) has considered this.  In a report released last July , CARB analyzed the total energy requirements for treating and pressurizing the gas to CNG fuel-tank pressures.   They found that the total energy required, including consumption of electricity and the biogas itself for gas processing and pressurization was 317,000 BTU per million BTU of CNG produced. In other words, processing and pressurizing consumed about 32% of the gas.  Our estimates of the energy consumption of the digester plant itself, including all heating, lighting, pumps, fans, motors would consume another 18% [see note 1], bringing the total consumed to about half the gas produced.  This means the typical garbage truck can go about 36 km for each tonne of food waste we feed into the system.  But we only need to drive it 30 km. Still energy to spare [see note 2].

Of course, biogas also emits much less greenhouse gas than diesel fuel while powering those garbage trucks.  The same CARB study cited above found that the processing and compression of biogas reduces emissions of greenhouse gases.  According to CARB, each tonne of food waste processed would save 100 kg CO2e (carbon dioxide equivalent). In addition, the diesel emissions saved in that 30 km round trip will save another 67 kg of CO2e.

These calculations illustrate how biogas from food waste is renewable energy.  Our plans for our plant in Vancouver BC are actually to produce electric power for the grid.  We’ll be producing renewable energy and offsetting fossil carbon fuel emissions.  Other projects, perhaps in your community, will produce CNG for vehicle fuel: an exciting prospect for closed loop equations whereby the trucks are powered by the food waste within.  Stay tuned!

NOTE 1: Most of this energy is electrical and would not actually be produced by the biogas if we are making CNG for vehicles, but it is included for comparison to other renewable energy sources.  Biogas conversion efficiency assumed is typical for small gas-to-electricity projects.

NOTE 2: In fact, a typical garbage truck can carry more than our hypothetical one tonne of organic waste.  Typical capacities are 4 tonnes or even more.  But on most trips the typical truck is never filled to capacity.  And the average load is always less than half of the full load, because the truck starts the collection trip empty.  The average load probably is more than one tonne, but we’re being very careful here not to overstate our case, and using the one tonne simplifies the presentation.  But some waste is likely riding for free in our example, meaning we have more energy to spare.

Next Page »